<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1">
<front>
<journal-meta>suppl
<journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">SDHM</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">SDHM</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SDHM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Structural Durability &#x0026; Health Monitoring</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1930-2991</issn>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1930-2983</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Tech Science Press</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>USA</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">75555</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32604/sdhm.2026.075555</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Analysis of the Comprehensive Structural System of the Three-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridge</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Analysis of the Comprehensive Structural System of the Three-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridge</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Analysis of the Comprehensive Structural System of the Three-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridge</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib id="author-1" contrib-type="author">
<name name-style="western"><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Dawei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib id="author-2" contrib-type="author">
<name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Xiang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib id="author-3" contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name name-style="western"><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Yuanyin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2">2</xref><email>songyuanyin@bnerc.com</email></contrib>
<contrib id="author-4" contrib-type="author">
<name name-style="western"><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Yaoyu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib id="author-5" contrib-type="author">
<name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Deyun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib id="author-6" contrib-type="author">
<name name-style="western"><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>Rong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib id="author-7" contrib-type="author">
<name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Wen-Wei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3">3</xref></contrib>
<aff id="aff-1"><label>1</label><institution>Guangdong Provincial Highway Construction Co., Ltd.</institution>, <addr-line>Guangzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff-2"><label>2</label><institution>CCCC Highway Bridges National Engineering Research Center Co., Ltd.</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff-3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Transportation, Southeast University</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><label>&#x002A;</label>Corresponding Author: Yuanyin Song. Email: <email>songyuanyin@bnerc.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
<day>30</day><month>6</month><year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>20</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<elocation-id>22</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>04</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>02</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2026 The Authors. Published by Tech Science Press.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>The Authors</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="TSP_SDHM_75555.pdf"></self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>This study systematically investigates the static and dynamic performance of the comprehensive structural system for the Huangmaohai extra-long-span three-tower cable-stayed bridge. A full-bridge finite element model was developed, incorporating elastic restraints at the central tower, viscous dampers at the side towers, and transverse seismic isolation bearings. Detailed structural parameters and loading conditions are provided. Subsequently, a systematic analysis was conducted on the structural stiffness, internal forces in the bearings, and stresses in the main girder and stay cables under static loads, thereby verifying the structural safety during both the completed bridge state and operational phase. Finally, through dynamic characteristic and seismic response analyses, the internal forces and displacement responses of the bridge towers in the baseline model and the comprehensive model under E1 and E2 seismic actions were compared. The results indicate that the proposed comprehensive structural system effectively controls main girder stresses, enhances structural stiffness, and significantly reduces seismic-induced internal forces. This research provides crucial technical bearing for the design and seismic optimization of similar extra-long-span cable-stayed bridges.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
<kwd>Cable-stayed bridge</kwd>
<kwd>static characteristics</kwd>
<kwd>dynamic characteristics</kwd>
<kwd>seismic response</kwd>
<kwd>finite element model</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<award-group id="awg1">
<funding-source>China Communications Construction Technology research project</funding-source>
<award-id>YSZX-03-2022-01-B</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Cable-stayed bridges, recognized for their substantial spanning capacity and adaptability to diverse topographical conditions, represent one of the primary structural types for long-span bridges [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-3">3</xref>]. With rapid economic development, the demand for crossing large rivers and valleys has driven significant advancements in cable-stayed bridge technology, leading to the construction of numerous super-long-span cable-stayed bridges [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-4">4</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-6">6</xref>]. However, as the length of the bridge increases, the impact of certain disasters or accidents, such as earthquakes, typhoons, and ship collisions, on the bridge will significantly increase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-7">7</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-9">9</xref>]. For cable systems, failures caused by factors such as fatigue and corrosion also impose higher demands on bridge constructors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-10">10</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-12">12</xref>]. This requires us to further ensure the safety and rationality of the overall structural design of the bridge.</p>
<p>A cable-stayed bridge primarily consists of three components: the girder, towers, and stay cables. Mechanically, the main girders are subjected to combined bending moments and axial forces. For spans exceeding 600 m, steel truss girders or steel box girders are predominantly employed. Long-span steel box girder cable-stayed bridges are highly statically indeterminate structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-13">13</xref>], offering advantages such as long spans, lightweight yet high strength, and construction efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-14">14</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-16">16</xref>]. Furthermore, they demonstrate superior performance in service life, construction speed, maintenance management, and economic efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-17">17</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-18">18</xref>]. The towers, functioning primarily in compression, are typically constructed from concrete to utilize its high compressive strength, substantial stiffness, and cost-effectiveness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-19">19</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-20">20</xref>]. The girder sections often utilize closed steel box designs, while the tower sections are generally made of concrete box structures. Stay cables commonly consist of parallel high-strength steel wires or strands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-21">21</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-23">23</xref>]. During bridge construction and service, variable actions such as vehicle loads, wind loads, and thermal effects must be comprehensively considered, as these constitute critical load cases in bridge design [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-24">24</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-26">26</xref>].</p>
<p>Extensive research has been conducted on the static and dynamic characteristics of cable-stayed bridges. Hiroshi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-27">27</xref>] applied the updated Lagrangian formulation and discretized the towers using closed box sections, analyzing the ultimate bearing capacity during construction and service stages by considering material nonlinearity while neglecting shear deformation. Qiu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-28">28</xref>] investigated static and dynamic behavior of a cable-stayed bridge with main span of 1800 m, examining the influence of parameters such as the rise-span ratio, the suspension-to-span ratio, the constraint condition of the stiffened girder, the number of auxiliary piers at side spans, the layout of suspension cables, and the elastic modulus of suspension cables. To reduce the internal stresses in the bridge towers and main girders, cable-stayed bridges employ floating or semi-floating systems. However, this results in insufficient longitudinal restraint of the main girders, necessitating the use of devices such as isolation bearings or elastic restraints to limit longitudinal displacement. Xu et al. proposed a novel vibration control system to constrain the longitudinal displacement of the levitation system based on the traditional tuned viscous mass damper and negative stiffness amplifying damper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-29">29</xref>].</p>
<p>This paper systematically studies the static and dynamic structural performance of the Huangmaohai Bridge, focusing on optimizing the comprehensive system for the distribution of internal forces within the bridge, thereby ensuring more reasonable stress during service and enhancing the bridge&#x2019;s resistance under seismic effects. A finite element model is established to analyze structural stiffness, bearing internal forces, and stresses in the main girder and stay cables under various service conditions. Furthermore, dynamic characteristics and seismic responses are examined, comparing the internal forces and displacement responses of the towers in the baseline model and the comprehensive model under E1 and E2 seismic events. This research provides valuable technical references for the design and seismic optimization of similar super-long-span cable-stayed bridges.</p>
<p>In the section on research gaps and contributions, this research confirms that the static performance of the Huangmaohai Bridge meets the code requirements and demonstrates the structural rationality. It also shows that the integrated structural system significantly enhances seismic performance, providing a viable seismic resistance strategy for long-span cable-stayed bridges. However, the finite element model used in this research simplifies the boundary and damping conditions, which require further investigation. Additionally, the performance of the integrated structural system under other types of disasters needs to be further validated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Engineering Background</title>
<p>The Huangmaohai extra-long-span three-tower cable-stayed bridge is recognized as the largest span bridge of its type both domestically and internationally, and is characterized by its innovative structural design. The structure is configured with single-column towers, separated steel box girders, and a spatial cable system with dual cable planes, while high aesthetic requirements are also imposed. The variable-cross-section and irregular tower shapes result in complex structural forces and significant construction challenges. The Huangmaohai Bridge is designed with a span arrangement of 100 &#x002B; 280 &#x002B; 2 &#x00D7; 720 &#x002B; 280 &#x002B; 100 m as a steel box girder cable-stayed bridge. The main girder is composed of two separate steel boxes connected by transverse cross girders. Parallel wire cables are employed, and vibration dampers are installed on the stay cables. The towers are constructed as concrete single-column structures. The pile caps are designed with circular shapes, while the transition piers and auxiliary piers are configured as full-width T-shaped sections. A rendering of the completed bridge is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-1">Fig. 1</xref>. Key design issues are addressed through systematic and structural innovations aimed at enhancing the vertical stiffness of the main girder, optimizing thermal stress distribution, achieving superior overall bridge performance, and ensuring economic efficiency in component dimensions.</p>
<fig id="fig-1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<title>Effect drawing of Huangmaohai Bridge with detail.</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-1.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<label>3</label>
<title>Calculation Model and Parameters</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Model Introduction</title>
<p>The bridge is configured with a span arrangement of 100 &#x002B; 280 &#x002B; 720 &#x002B; 720 &#x002B; 280 &#x002B; 100 &#x003D; 2200 m, forming a three-tower cable-stayed bridge with single-column towers and dual cable planes. The span-to-depth ratio is specified as 0.25, while the side-to-main span ratio is designed as 0.53. Both the side and central towers are constructed to an identical height of 263 m. And a comprehensive structural system composed of the following devices is applied to the Huangmaohai Bridge.</p>
<p>To improve the vertical stiffness of the bridge, five pairs of auxiliary cables are installed at the central tower, providing supplementary vertical support and contributing to better control of tower and deck deformations. Longitudinal restraint between the central tower and the girder is provided by 16 longitudinal elastic cables with a tensile strength of 1960 MPa, arranged in parallel and anchored to the top and bottom slabs of the transverse connection box. The equivalent stiffness of cables is evaluated to be K &#x003D; 6.5 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup> kN/m. At the side towers, fluid viscous dampers are installed between the towers and girders, with four dampers per tower. The fluid viscous dampers are intended to dissipate longitudinal seismic energy and to control the relative displacement between the side towers and the girder. The damping parameters are specified as a damping coefficient C &#x003D; 2500 kN/(m/s) and damping exponent &#x03B1; &#x003D; 0.3.</p>
<p>For transverse restraint, energy-dissipating anti-wind bearings are installed at the tower&#x2013;girder connections of both the side and central towers. The anti-wind bearings provide transverse restraint while allowing longitudinal and vertical movements. In addition, friction pendulum bearings are installed at the transition piers and auxiliary piers to provide seismic isolation. The friction pendulum bearings consist of longitudinal sliding plates, translational sliding plates, spherical liners, spherical bearing plates, and transverse sliding plates. The friction pendulum bearings allow horizontal sliding and provide a restoring force governed by the spherical curvature, thereby achieving seismic isolation.</p>
<p>These structural features, including the detailed configuration of control devices and their nonlinear mechanical characteristics, are explicitly incorporated into the finite element model. This comprehensive modeling approach enables a more realistic representation of the dynamic behavior of the bridge under extreme loading scenarios, particularly in both longitudinal and transverse directions. The general layout of the bridge is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-2">Fig. 2</xref>, with the main cables in blue and the auxiliary cables in green.</p>
<fig id="fig-2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<title>General layout of three-tower cable-stayed bridge (Unit: mm).</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-2.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Calculate Model Parameters</title>
<sec id="s3_2_1">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Main Components and Materials</title>
<p>The towers are constructed using C60 grade concrete, while the transition piers and auxiliary piers are built with C50 grade concrete. The key mechanical properties of the various concrete grades are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>. The main girders are fabricated from Q345QD steel, with its principal mechanical properties provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>. The yield strength of the steel and its corresponding allowable stresses are determined according to the specifications of GB/T 714-2000, with variations based on plate thickness. The stay cables are manufactured from high-strength steel wires with a diameter of 7 mm. The elastic modulus of the cable material is specified as 195,000 MPa, while the coefficient of thermal expansion is given as 0.000012.</p>
<table-wrap id="table-1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<title>Performance of concrete materials.</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/> </colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" colspan="2">Concrete Grade</th>
<th>C50</th>
<th>C60</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" colspan="2">Application Structure</th>
<th>Transition Piers/Auxiliary Piers</th>
<th>Cable Tower</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="8">Mechanical properties</td>
<td>Elastic modulus/E (MPa)</td>
<td>34,500</td>
<td>36,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shear modulus/G (MPa)</td>
<td>13,800</td>
<td>14,400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Poisson ratio/&#x03B3;</td>
<td>0.2</td>
<td>0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Axial compressive design strength/MPa</td>
<td>22.4</td>
<td>27.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tensile design strength/MPa</td>
<td>1.83</td>
<td>2.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Axial compressive standard strength/MPa</td>
<td>32.4</td>
<td>38.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tensile standard strength/MPa</td>
<td>2.65</td>
<td>2.85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coefficient of thermal expansion/1/&#x00B0;C</td>
<td>0.000010</td>
<td>0.000010</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<title>Structural steel properties.</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/> </colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>Q345QD</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Elastic modulus/E (MPa)</td>
<td>210,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shear modulus/G (MPa)</td>
<td>81,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Poisson ratio/&#x03B3;</td>
<td>0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yield strength &#x03C3;s (MPa)</td>
<td>345</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coefficient of linear expansion (1/&#x00B0;C)</td>
<td>0.000012</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_2">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Calculation of Loads</title>
<p>The following load cases are considered in the analysis: (1) Permanent actions: These include the self-weight of the structure and the bridge deck pavement; (2) Highway live loads: The Highway-I grade loading standard is adopted. The bridge is designed for 8 traffic lanes, with longitudinal and transverse reduction factors as well as transverse eccentricity factors being incorporated; (3) Thermal actions: A uniform temperature increase of 27&#x00B0;C and decrease of &#x2212;27&#x00B0;C are considered. Local temperature differentials are determined with reference to relevant design codes. The temperature gradient across the steel box girder section is specified according to the BS 5400 standard; (4) Wind loads: The basic design wind speed at the bridge site is determined as 46 m/s; (5) Seismic actions: The seismic design intensity is set at VII degree. Calculations are performed based on the current seismic safety evaluation report; (6) Ship collision loads: The collision forces are specified as 184 MN in the direction parallel to the water flow and 46 MN in the direction perpendicular to the water flow for both side and central towers. The acceleration response spectra for 3% damping ratios are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-3">Fig. 3</xref>. Corresponding to these spectra, the Guangdong Earthquake Engineering Survey Center has provided ground acceleration time histories for two seismic intensity levels. Three horizontal acceleration time history records are provided. Based on multiple earthquake records, the vertical-to-horizontal acceleration ratio usually falls within 0.5&#x2013;0.65 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-30">30</xref>]. Although vertical and horizontal components differ in waveform, including amplitude, phase, and frequency content, adopting 0.65 as a simplified treatment remains reasonable for most conventional structural design needs; therefore, the vertical acceleration time histories are taken as 0.65 times the corresponding horizontal values. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-4">Fig. 4</xref> shows the horizontal acceleration time history curves for E1 and E2 levels.</p>
<fig id="fig-3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<title>Damping specific acceleration response spectrum: (<bold>a</bold>) E1 level 3% damping specific acceleration response spectrum; (<bold>b</bold>) E2 level 3% damping specific acceleration response spectrum.</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-3.tif"/>
</fig><fig id="fig-4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<title>Horizontal acceleration time history: (<bold>a</bold>) The first horizontal acceleration time history at the E1 level; (<bold>b</bold>) The second horizontal acceleration time history at the E1 level; (<bold>c</bold>) The third horizontal acceleration time history at the E1 level; (<bold>d</bold>) The first horizontal acceleration time history at the E2 level; (<bold>e</bold>) The second horizontal acceleration time history at the E2 level; (<bold>f</bold>) The third horizontal acceleration time history at the E2 level.</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-4.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_3">
<label>3.2.3</label>
<title>Static and Dynamic Finite Element Model</title>
<p>The global static analysis of the entire bridge is performed using a spatial beam-element program. The structure is discretized based on its theoretical vertical alignment, and the internal forces and displacements under various load cases are analyzed. The full-bridge analytical model is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-5">Fig. 5</xref>, and schematic diagrams of the main tower are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-6">Fig. 6</xref>. A dynamic computational model of the Huangmaohai Bridge is established using the MIDAS finite element software for seismic performance analysis. A three-dimensional finite element model is developed, where the global coordinate system is defined with the X-axis aligned with the longitudinal bridge direction, the Y-axis with the transverse direction, and the Z-axis with the vertical direction. In this model, the towers, main girder, and piers are all discretized as spatial beam elements. For the dynamic analysis, a fixed connection at the central tower is adopted. The dynamic computational model is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-7">Fig. 7</xref>.</p>
<fig id="fig-5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<title>Static analysis model of the entire bridge.</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-5.tif"/>
</fig><fig id="fig-6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<title>Schematic diagram of the main tower: (<bold>a</bold>) Horizontal schematic diagram of the main tower; (<bold>b</bold>) Longitudinal schematic diagram of the main tower.</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-6.tif"/>
</fig><fig id="fig-7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<title>Dynamic calculation model.</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-7.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<label>4</label>
<title>Static Analysis</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Displacement Calculation</title>
<p>In the calculation results, axial forces and stresses are defined as positive in tension and negative in compression. Based on the computational outcomes, displacement values under live loads and wind loads are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>. In the table, Combination 4 is constant load &#x002B; live load &#x002B; temperature &#x002B; live load transverse wind; Combination 5 is constant load &#x002B; temperature &#x002B; 100-year transverse wind; Combination 6 is constant load &#x002B; live load &#x002B; temperature &#x002B; live load longitudinal wind; and Combination 7 is constant load &#x002B; temperature &#x002B; 100-year longitudinal wind. The maximum vertical displacement at mid-span of the two spans of the bridge is calculated through the above combination, including both upward and downward displacements, with upward displacement considered positive and downward displacement negative. The calculated maximum displacement is then divided by the corresponding span length to obtain the deflection-to-span ratio. The envelope diagram of vertical deflections in the main girder under live loads is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-8">Fig. 8</xref>. The vertical deflection-to-span ratio is calculated as 1.691/720 &#x003D; 1/426, indicating that the vertical displacement satisfies the design requirements.</p>
<table-wrap id="table-3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<title>Structural deformation (m).</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Direction</th>
<th>Part</th>
<th>Combination</th>
<th>Displacement Value (m)</th>
<th>Amplitude Sum (m)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Vertical</td>
<td>Midspan</td>
<td>Live load</td>
<td>0.641/&#x2212;1.076</td>
<td>1.691</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="11">Longitudinal</td>
<td rowspan="4">Left beam end</td>
<td>Combination 4</td>
<td>0.435/&#x2212;0.727</td>
<td>1.162</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 5</td>
<td>0.391/&#x2212;0.705</td>
<td>1.096</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 6</td>
<td>0.452/&#x2212;0.744</td>
<td>1.196</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 7</td>
<td>0.481/&#x2212;0.796</td>
<td>1.277</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">Right beam end</td>
<td>Combination 4</td>
<td>0.727/&#x2212;0.435</td>
<td>1.162</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 5</td>
<td>0.705/&#x2212;0.390</td>
<td>1.095</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 6</td>
<td>0.744/&#x2212;0.451</td>
<td>1.195</td>
</tr>
<tr> 
<td>Combination 7</td>
<td>0.796/&#x2212;0.481</td>
<td>1.277</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">Top of the middle tower</td>
<td>Combination 4</td>
<td>0.498/&#x2212;0.498</td>
<td>0.996</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 4</td>
<td>0.523/&#x2212;0.523</td>
<td>1.047</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 7</td>
<td>0.137/&#x2212;0.137</td>
<td>0.274</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">Horizontal</td>
<td>Main girder at mid-span</td>
<td>Combination 5</td>
<td>0.463/&#x2212;0.463</td>
<td>0.926</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Top of the middle Tower</td>
<td>Combination 5</td>
<td>1.935/&#x2212;1.935</td>
<td>3.870</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Top of side tower</td>
<td>Combination 5</td>
<td>1.428/&#x2212;1.428</td>
<td>2.856</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="table-3fn1" fn-type="other">
<p>&#x002A;Note: Positive values indicate displacement toward the center span, negative values indicate displacement toward the side spans.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><fig id="fig-8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<title>Envelope diagram of vertical deflection of the main beam under live load: (<bold>a</bold>) Maximum value; (<bold>b</bold>) Minimum value.</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-8.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Internal Force of the Bearing</title>
<p>The vertical reaction forces at the bearings of the auxiliary piers and transition piers are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>. As shown in the table, all bearings are maintained in compression without exhibiting tensile forces. Thus, the installation of tension-resistant bearings is not required. The maximum vertical reaction recorded is 1430 t. The reaction forces of the transverse wind-resistant bearings under lateral wind load are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref>. The results demonstrate that the transverse wind-resistant bearings satisfy the design requirements. Under the most critical load combination, the wind-resistant bearings at the bridge towers are subjected to significant forces. Specifically, the bearing at the central tower carries a load of 3200 t, presenting considerable design challenges and requiring specialized optimization in their design.</p>
<table-wrap id="table-4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<title>Reaction forces of auxiliary piers and transition piers bearings (kN).</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/> </colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" colspan="2">Load Combination</th>
<th>Auxiliary Pier Bearing</th>
<th>Transition Pier Bearing</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="2">Constant load</td>
<td>&#x2212;10,964</td>
<td>&#x2212;4573</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" rowspan="2">The most unfavorable</td>
<td>Nmax</td>
<td>&#x2212;14,287</td>
<td>&#x2212;6382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nmin</td>
<td>&#x2212;3412</td>
<td>&#x2212;3675</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<title>Reaction force at the bearing of the main tower/lateral shear force of the bearing of the pier/auxiliary pier (kN).</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Load Combination</th>
<th>Middle Tower Bearing</th>
<th>Wind-Resistant Bearing for the Side Tower</th>
<th>Auxiliary Pier Bearing</th>
<th>Transition Pier Bearing</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>The most unfavorable</td>
<td>32,096</td>
<td>28,524</td>
<td>1759</td>
<td>1518</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Stress of Steel Main Beam</title>
<p>The stresses at the upper and lower flanges of the steel box girder during both the bridge completion stage and operational stage are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-6">Table 6</xref>. It is observed from the calculation results that the maximum stress in the steel main girder is 222 MPa, which is lower than the design strength of Q345 steel. Thus, the code requirements are satisfied. Where combination 1 is constant load (bridge formation stage); combination 2 is constant load &#x002B; live load; combination 3 is constant load &#x002B; live load &#x002B; temperature.</p>
<table-wrap id="table-6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<title>Maximum stress values of main beams under various working conditions (MPa).</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/> </colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2">Load Combinations</th>
<th colspan="2">Upper Edge Stress</th>
<th colspan="2">Lower Edge Stress</th>
<th rowspan="2">Strength Design Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>MAX</th>
<th>MIN</th>
<th>MAX</th>
<th>MIN</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Combination 1</td>
<td>49</td>
<td>&#x2212;96</td>
<td>47</td>
<td>&#x2212;100</td>
<td>270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 2</td>
<td>85</td>
<td>&#x2212;138</td>
<td>97</td>
<td>&#x2212;168</td>
<td>270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 3</td>
<td>128</td>
<td>&#x2212;159</td>
<td>177</td>
<td>&#x2212;178</td>
<td>270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 4</td>
<td>130</td>
<td>&#x2212;161</td>
<td>182</td>
<td>&#x2212;183</td>
<td>270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 5</td>
<td>122</td>
<td>&#x2212;222</td>
<td>114</td>
<td>&#x2212;168</td>
<td>270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 6</td>
<td>129</td>
<td>&#x2212;159</td>
<td>179</td>
<td>&#x2212;179</td>
<td>270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Combination 7</td>
<td>122</td>
<td>&#x2212;137</td>
<td>102</td>
<td>&#x2212;142</td>
<td>270</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Stress of Stay Cables</title>
<p>The cable forces under the completed bridge state and the cable stresses under the most unfavorable load combinations are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-9">Fig. 9</xref> for the stay cables, and in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-7">Table 7</xref> for the auxiliary cables. It can be observed from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-9">Fig. 9</xref> that under the most critical combination, the maximum and minimum stresses in the stay cables are 659 and 184 MPa, respectively. The safety factors for all stay cables are verified to exceed 2.7. For the auxiliary cables, the maximum and minimum stresses are 525 and 249 MPa, respectively, with all safety factors demonstrated to be greater than 3.5.</p>
<fig id="fig-9">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption>
<title>Cable-stayed force during the bridge formation stage: (<bold>a</bold>) Unloaded cable-stayed force in the bridge formation state; (<bold>b</bold>) The most unfavorable combination of stay cable stress.</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-9.tif"/>
</fig><table-wrap id="table-7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption>
<title>Auxiliary cable stress and parameter table.</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/> </colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Auxiliary Cable Number</th>
<th>Parallel Steel Wire Model</th>
<th>Constant Load</th>
<th align="center" colspan="2">Most Unfavorable Combination (MPa)</th>
<th>Safety Factor</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th>Beam Ends</th>
<th>Max</th>
<th>Min</th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>7-337</td>
<td>309</td>
<td>399</td>
<td>414</td>
<td>4.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>7-337</td>
<td>305</td>
<td>389</td>
<td>249</td>
<td>4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>7-337</td>
<td>312</td>
<td>396</td>
<td>256</td>
<td>4.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>7-337</td>
<td>382</td>
<td>502</td>
<td>270</td>
<td>3.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>7-337</td>
<td>397</td>
<td>525</td>
<td>301</td>
<td>3.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<label>5</label>
<title>Dynamic Analysis</title>
<sec id="s5_1">
<label>5.1</label>
<title>Dynamic Characterization</title>
<p>Based on the established dynamic computational model, a structural dynamic characteristic analysis was conducted. The frequencies and mode shape characteristics of the first ten vibration modes of the Huangmaohai Bridge are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-8">Table 8</xref>. Graphical representations of typical vibration modes are provided in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig-10">Fig. 10</xref>. When the first 150 vibration modes are considered, the mass participation factors in all directions are verified to exceed 99%, thereby meeting the code requirements. It should be noted that only the vibration modes of the main bridge are displayed in the following figures.</p>
<table-wrap id="table-8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption>
<title>Dynamic characteristics of huangmaohai bridge.</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Vibration Mode</th>
<th>Period (s)</th>
<th>Frequency (Hz)</th>
<th>Mode Shape Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>7.22</td>
<td>0.14</td>
<td>The central tower bends laterally</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>6.64</td>
<td>0.15</td>
<td>The towers on both sides bend in opposite directions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>6.56</td>
<td>0.15</td>
<td>The two towers bend in the same direction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>6.33</td>
<td>0.16</td>
<td>The main beam is opposed to vertical bending</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>5.07</td>
<td>0.20</td>
<td>The main beam is opposed to symmetrical transverse bending</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>3.93</td>
<td>0.25</td>
<td>The entire bridge is opposed to longitudinal bending</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>3.81</td>
<td>0.26</td>
<td>The main beam is vertically curved in a symmetrical pattern</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>3.60</td>
<td>0.28</td>
<td>The main beam is symmetrically bent horizontally</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>3.19</td>
<td>0.31</td>
<td>The main beam is opposed to vertical bending</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>2.68</td>
<td>0.37</td>
<td>The main beam is vertically curved in a symmetrical pattern</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap><fig id="fig-10">
<label>Figure 10</label>
<caption>
<title>First-order mode shape diagram (Period: 7.22 s).</title>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tif" xlink:href="SDHM_75555-fig-10.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_2">
<label>5.2</label>
<title>Internal Forces of the Tower</title>
<p>Based on the computational results, the internal forces in the towers of the two models are compared in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-9">Table 9</xref>. Compared with the baseline model, significant influences on the longitudinal bending moments are observed in both the side and central towers, with a more pronounced effect on the central tower. Specifically, the longitudinal bending moments at the base and deck level of the side towers are slightly reduced by approximately 22%. A reduction of about 10% is observed at the smallest cross-section. For the central tower, the longitudinal bending moment at the base is minimally reduced by only 6%. In contrast, the longitudinal bending moments at the deck level and the smallest cross-section are significantly reduced by 41%. Additionally, under the most unfavorable static loading conditions, the transverse bending moments at the critical sections of the towers are found to remain essentially unchanged compared to the baseline model.</p>
<table-wrap id="table-9">
<label>Table 9</label>
<caption>
<title>Comparison of internal forces of the tower.</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" colspan="2">Part</th>
<th colspan="2">Basic Model</th>
<th colspan="2">Comprehensive Model</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th>M2</th>
<th>M3</th>
<th>M2</th>
<th>M3</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">Side tower</td>
<td>The bottom of the tower</td>
<td>4,195,836</td>
<td>2,066,681</td>
<td>4,213,207</td>
<td>1,601,900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>At the bridge deck</td>
<td>1,765,224</td>
<td>1,371,159</td>
<td>1,771,162</td>
<td>1,048,130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>The finest part</td>
<td>596,832</td>
<td>434,964</td>
<td>594,995</td>
<td>392,457</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">Middle tower</td>
<td>The bottom of the tower</td>
<td>5,761,578</td>
<td>2,931,586</td>
<td>5,775,038</td>
<td>2,749,722</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>At the bridge deck</td>
<td>2,290,835</td>
<td>1,771,044</td>
<td>2,317,514</td>
<td>1,070,898</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>The finest part</td>
<td>815,610</td>
<td>463,357</td>
<td>839,056</td>
<td>269,272</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_3">
<label>5.3</label>
<title>Seismic Response Comparison</title>
<p>Under the seismic events E1 and E2, the calculation differences between the baseline model and the comprehensive model are compared. The seismic responses of the key sections of the bridge towers in both models are summarized in the following <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-10">Tables 10</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-11">11</xref>. As indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-10">Tables 10</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-11">11</xref>, the internal forces at critical sections are generally reduced in the comprehensive model compared to the benchmark model under both E1 and E2 seismic actions. Under combined longitudinal-vertical seismic excitation, reductions ranging from 23% to 54% are observed at most critical sections, except at the deck level of the side towers where the reduction is relatively modest. For transverse-vertical seismic excitation, more significant reductions are achieved at the pile cap bottom and tower base sections. The side towers experience approximately 20% reduction at both the tower base and pile cap bottom, while the central tower demonstrates approximately 30% reduction at these locations. However, smaller reductions are observed at the deck level and the minimum cross-section. At the central tower, the bending moments at these sections are reduced by only about 4% under E1 seismic action. Similarly, at the minimum cross-section of the side towers, the bending moment reduction is merely 2% under E2 seismic action. For other loading conditions, these two sections demonstrate reduction rates between 15% and 29%. According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-12">Tables 12</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-13">13</xref>, the tower top displacements are found to be essentially identical between the two models under transverse-vertical seismic excitation, with minimal variations in girder end displacements. However, under longitudinal-vertical seismic excitation, the girder end displacements are substantially reduced by approximately 20% in the comprehensive model.</p>
<table-wrap id="table-10">
<label>Table 10</label>
<caption>
<title>Seismic responses at key sections under longitudinal &#x002B; vertical seismic excitation (kN&#x00B7;m).</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Item</th>
<th colspan="2">Benchmark Model</th>
<th colspan="2">Comprehensive Model</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th>E1</th>
<th>E2</th>
<th>E1</th>
<th>E2</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">Side Tower</td>
<td>Pile Cap Bottom</td>
<td>1,456,921</td>
<td>2,531,942</td>
<td>1,128,864</td>
<td>1,653,270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Base</td>
<td>1,071,352</td>
<td>1,512,561</td>
<td>1,028,751</td>
<td>1,536,224</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deck Level</td>
<td>740,725</td>
<td>1,001,222</td>
<td>369,753</td>
<td>555,168</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Minimum Section</td>
<td>516,868</td>
<td>587,292</td>
<td>243,704</td>
<td>321,900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">Central Tower</td>
<td>Pile Cap Bottom</td>
<td>4,720,017</td>
<td>7,925,594</td>
<td>2,618,370</td>
<td>3,644,434</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Base</td>
<td>4,128,801</td>
<td>6,599,261</td>
<td>2,418,600</td>
<td>3,256,409</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deck Level</td>
<td>935,411</td>
<td>985,287</td>
<td>699,179</td>
<td>511,765</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Minimum Section</td>
<td>460,258</td>
<td>616,085</td>
<td>276,999</td>
<td>438,555</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-11">
<label>Table 11</label>
<caption>
<title>Seismic responses at key sections under transverse &#x002B; vertical seismic excitation (kN&#x00B7;m).</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" rowspan="2">Item</th>
<th colspan="2">Benchmark Model</th>
<th colspan="2">Comprehensive Model</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>E1</th>
<th>E2</th>
<th>E1</th>
<th>E1</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">Side Tower</td>
<td>Pile Cap Bottom</td>
<td>2,865,819</td>
<td>4,119,672</td>
<td>2,310,252</td>
<td>3,023,279</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Base</td>
<td>2,357,881</td>
<td>3,338,494</td>
<td>2,059,209</td>
<td>2,678,831</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deck Level</td>
<td>960,022</td>
<td>1,408,411</td>
<td>866,937</td>
<td>1,004,238</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Minimum Section</td>
<td>606,345</td>
<td>719,463</td>
<td>431,424</td>
<td>704,761</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">Central Tower</td>
<td>Pile Cap Bottom</td>
<td>2,915,038</td>
<td>5,091,612</td>
<td>2,226,472</td>
<td>3,020,805</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Base</td>
<td>2,470,247</td>
<td>4,163,215</td>
<td>2,086,136</td>
<td>2,721,070</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deck Level</td>
<td>1,046,735</td>
<td>1,771,731</td>
<td>1,034,488</td>
<td>1,476,114</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Minimum Section</td>
<td>598,906</td>
<td>901,257</td>
<td>563,578</td>
<td>766,098</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-12">
<label>Table 12</label>
<caption>
<title>Displacements at key points under longitudinal &#x002B; vertical seismic excitation (m).</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/> </colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" rowspan="2">Key Point</th>
<th align="center" colspan="2">Benchmark Model</th>
<th align="center" colspan="2">Comprehensive Model</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>E1</th>
<th>E2</th>
<th>E1</th>
<th>E2</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>East Girder End</td>
<td>0.151</td>
<td>0.243</td>
<td>0.128</td>
<td>0.191</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>West Girder End</td>
<td>0.153</td>
<td>0.266</td>
<td>0.135</td>
<td>0.198</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Side Tower Top</td>
<td>0.197</td>
<td>0.296</td>
<td>0.176</td>
<td>0.277</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Central Tower Top</td>
<td>0.200</td>
<td>0.283</td>
<td>0.143</td>
<td>0.264</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-13">
<label>Table 13</label>
<caption>
<title>Displacements at key points under transverse &#x002B; vertical seismic excitation (m).</title>
</caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/> </colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" rowspan="2">Key Point</th>
<th align="center" colspan="2">Benchmark Model</th>
<th align="center" colspan="2">Comprehensive Model</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>E1</th>
<th>E2</th>
<th>E1</th>
<th>E2</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>East Girder End</td>
<td>0.057</td>
<td>0.078</td>
<td>0.058</td>
<td>0.080</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>West Girder End</td>
<td>0.186</td>
<td>0.250</td>
<td>0.187</td>
<td>0.255</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Side Tower Top</td>
<td>0.600</td>
<td>0.845</td>
<td>0.605</td>
<td>0.850</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Central Tower Top</td>
<td>0.913</td>
<td>1.159</td>
<td>0.919</td>
<td>1.168</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<label>6</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study systematically investigates the static and dynamic structural behavior of the Huangmao Sea Bridge through refined finite element modeling. It explores the contributions of critical structural components, including the elastic restraints of the central tower, the dampers of the side towers, and the transverse seismic isolation system, in structural modeling and response analysis. The findings contribute to innovative approaches in seismic design and structural optimization of long-span sea-crossing bridges. The main conclusions are summarized as follows:</p>
<p>(1) The static performance is verified to satisfy code requirements. Under static load combinations, the maximum stress in the main girder is controlled at 222 MPa, which remains below the design strength of Q345 steel. The vertical deflection-to-span ratio is determined as 1/426, confirming adequate stiffness compliance. The safety factors for stay cables and auxiliary cables exceed 2.7 and 3.5 respectively, demonstrating that the overall structure is confirmed to be within the safe range. These results not only validate the structural design but also provide a refined reference for the static performance evaluation of long-span sea-crossing bridges with similar configurations.</p>
<p>(2) The comprehensive structural system is demonstrated to significantly improve seismic performance. Compared with the benchmark model, the internal forces at critical tower sections are generally reduced under both E1 and E2 seismic events. Under longitudinal-vertical seismic excitation, bending moment reductions of 23%&#x2013;54% are achieved at key sections of both side and central towers. Under transverse-vertical excitation, the bending moments at tower bases are reduced by 20% and 30% for side and central towers respectively, demonstrating effective seismic mitigation. These results highlight the effectiveness of the proposed system in mitigating seismic impacts and offer valuable insights for the seismic optimization of long-span cable-stayed bridges.</p>
<p>(3) Significant displacement control is achieved through the integrated structural measures. Under longitudinal-vertical seismic excitation, the end displacements of the main girder are reduced by approximately 20% in the comprehensive model, with similar reductions observed at the tops of the towers. The overall structural displacement response is effectively suppressed, demonstrating the effectiveness of the implemented damping and restraint systems. These findings validate the proposed control strategy and offer practical guidance for enhancing the seismic resilience of long-span bridges.</p>
<p>While this study provides valuable insights into the seismic performance of long-span sea-crossing cable-stayed bridges, certain shortcomings remain. For instance, the current analysis focuses primarily on the structural response under idealized boundary conditions and simplified damping models. This research lays the groundwork for future research. Subsequent studies will focus on the development of key energy dissipation and restraint devices tailored for multi-tower, ultra-long-span sea-crossing cable-stayed bridges, as well as the investigation of critical parameters influencing energy dissipation and restraint strategies. These efforts aim to further enhance the seismic resilience and design precision of complex bridge systems.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</ack>
<sec>
<title>Funding Statement</title>
<p>This research is bearinged by the China Communications Construction Technology research project (YSZX-03-2022-01-B). The authors express sincere appreciation for their contributions to this research.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: Conceptualization, Dawei Shen and Xiang Chen; methodology, Yuanyin Song and Yaoyu Zhu; software, Deyun Liu and Rong Lv; validation, Yaoyu Zhu, Rong Lv and Wen-Wei Wang; formal analysis, Dawei Shen, Yaoyu Zhu, Yuanyin Song and Deyun Liu; investigation, Xiang Chen and Rong Lv; resources, Dawei Shen; data curation, Dawei Shen and Xiang Chen; original draft preparation, Yuanyin Song, Deyun Liu; writing&#x2014;review and editing, Yaoyu Zhu and Wen-Wei Wang; visualization, Rong Lv; supervision, Yuanyin Song and Yaoyu Zhu; project administration, Dawei Shen and Xiang Chen; funding acquisition, Dawei Shen and Xiang Chen. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Availability of Data and Materials</title>
<p>Data available on request from the authors. The data that bearing the findings of this study are available from the Corresponding Author, [Yuanyin Song], upon reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Ethics Approval</title>
<p>This study was conducted in accordance with institutional ethical guidelines. No human subject was involved.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflicts of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list content-type="authoryear">
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref-1"><label>[1]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Pursuit for industrialized construction of Nanjing Jiangxinzhou Yangtze River bridge</article-title>. <source>Struct Eng Int</source>. <year>2022</year>;<volume>32</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>252</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10168664.2021.1955086</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-2"><label>[2]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>SZ</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Structural type selection for long-span bridges in mountain area</article-title>. <source>Appl Mech Mater</source>. <year>2012</year>;<volume>256&#x2013;259</volume>:<fpage>1596</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>600</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.256-259.1596</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-3"><label>[3]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Key construction technology of HuSuTong Yangtze River bridge</article-title>. <source>Struct Eng Int</source>. <year>2023</year>;<volume>33</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>84</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10168664.2021.1991252</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-4"><label>[4]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Calvi</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sullivan</surname> <given-names>TJ</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Villani</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Conceptual seismic design of cable-stayed bridges</article-title>. <source>J Earthq Eng</source>. <year>2010</year>;<volume>14</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>1139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13632469.2010.505275</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-5"><label>[5]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Structural health monitoring methods of cables in cable-stayed bridge: a review</article-title>. <source>Measurement</source>. <year>2021</year>;<volume>168</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>108343</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108343</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-6"><label>[6]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Cable-stayed bridge model updating based on response surface method</article-title>. <source>Struct Durab Health Monit</source>. <year>2025</year>;<volume>19</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>919</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32604/sdhm.2025.062537</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-7"><label>[7]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>YZ</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>ZH</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>PW</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Multi-hazard fragility analysis of cross-sea cable-stayed bridges cable bent tower under seismic-wind combined action</article-title>. <source>Soil Dyn Earthq Eng</source>. <year>2025</year>;<volume>195</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>109422</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109422</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-8"><label>[8]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact resistance for ECC-RC bridge columns protected by an innovative steel-GFRP-foam anti-collision device: experimental, numerical and theoretical analysis</article-title>. <source>Compos Struct</source>. <year>2025</year>;<volume>373</volume>:<fpage>119667</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119667</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-9"><label>[9]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Pattern and mechanism of wind-induced static instability of super-long-span cable-stayed bridge under large deformation</article-title>. <source>J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn</source>. <year>2022</year>;<volume>221</volume>:<fpage>104910</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104910</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-10"><label>[10]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Fatigue life evaluation of bridge stay cables subject to monitoring traffic and considering road roughness</article-title>. <source>Eng Struct</source>. <year>2023</year>;<volume>293</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>116572</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116572</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-11"><label>[11]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Explainable machine learning driven strength degradation investigation of BFRP bar in seawater and sea sand concrete environment</article-title>. <source>Structures</source>. <year>2025</year>;<volume>71</volume>:<fpage>108205</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108205</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-12"><label>[12]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Lifetime seismic resilience assessment of a sea-crossing cable-stayed bridge exposed to long-term scour and corrosion</article-title>. <source>Ocean Eng</source>. <year>2024</year>;<volume>295</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>116990</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.116990</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-13"><label>[13]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gimsing</surname> <given-names>NJ</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Georgakis</surname> <given-names>CT</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <source>Cable bearinged bridges: concept and design</source>. <edition>3rd ed</edition>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley &#x0026; Sons</publisher-name>; <year>2012</year>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-14"><label>[14]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Steel-concrete composite cable-stayed bridge&#x2014;main bridge of the Jiangxinzhou Yangtze River bridge at Nanjing</article-title>. <source>Struct Eng Int</source>. <year>2023</year>;<volume>33</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10168664.2021.1999191</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-15"><label>[15]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Study on the mechanical performance of wet concrete joints in large-span composite steel-concrete cable-stayed bridges</article-title>. <source>Struct Durab Health Monit</source>. <year>2025</year>;<volume>19</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32604/sdhm.2024.058451</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-16"><label>[16]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="conf-proc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mary</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Joseph</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Seismic performance evaluation of cable-stayed suspension bridge</article-title>. In: <conf-name>Proceedings of SECON&#x2019;24</conf-name>. <publisher-loc>Cham, Switzerland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer Nature</publisher-name>; <year>2024</year>. p. <fpage>1199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>212</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-031-70431-4_89</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-17"><label>[17]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mangalathu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Machine learning-based full-life-cycle seismic response assessment for in-service bridge piers: comprehensive analysis of interpretability and seismic fragility</article-title>. <source>Structures</source>. <year>2025</year>;<volume>80</volume>:<fpage>110050</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110050</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-18"><label>[18]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ruiz-Teran</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Aparicio</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Structural behaviour and design criteria of under-deck cable-stayed bridges and combined cable-stayed bridges. Part 2: multispan bridges</article-title>. <source>Can J Civ Eng</source>. <year>2008</year>;<volume>35</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<fpage>951</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/l08-034</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-19"><label>[19]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>WW</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Failure modes analysis of reinforced concrete beams under impact loads based on machine learning and SHAP approach</article-title>. <source>Eng Fail Anal</source>. <year>2026</year>;<volume>183</volume>:<fpage>110281</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.110281</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-20"><label>[20]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>SB</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>LH</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>XL</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Study on asymmetric arrangement ratio of main span stay cables of multi-tower cable-stayed bridge</article-title>. <source>Structures</source>. <year>2024</year>;<volume>64</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>106539</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106539</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-21"><label>[21]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Shake table test on a long-span cable-stayed bridge with viscous dampers considering wave passage effects</article-title>. <source>J Bridge Eng</source>. <year>2021</year>;<volume>26</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>04020118</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001665</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-22"><label>[22]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Comparative research of extra-large-span cable-stayed bridge with steel truss girder and steel box girder</article-title>. <source>MATEC Web Conf</source>. <year>2015</year>;<volume>25</volume>:<fpage>04002</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/matecconf/20152504002</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-23"><label>[23]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>XJ</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Investigation on mechanics performance of cable-stayed-suspension hybrid bridges</article-title>. <source>Wind Struct</source>. <year>2007</year>;<volume>10</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>533</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12989/was.2007.10.6.533</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-24"><label>[24]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>HH</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Research on significant influencing factors and intelligent prediction of long-term performance of cable-stayed bridges [dissertation]. Shanghai, China: Tongji University</article-title>; <year>2020</year>. <comment>(In Chinese)</comment>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-25"><label>[25]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Intelligent recurrence and prediction of long-term mechanical properties of in-service cable-stayed bridges with ambient temperature and concrete time-dependent effects</article-title>. <source>J Civ Struct Health Monit</source>. <year>2022</year>;<volume>12</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>659</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13349-022-00573-5</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-26"><label>[26]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Crashworthiness analysis of a novel steel-GFRP-foam protective structure for ECC-RC pier against vessel collision</article-title>. <source>Ocean Eng</source>. <year>2025</year>;<volume>340</volume>:<fpage>122299</fpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.122299</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-27"><label>[27]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hiroshi</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Toshiyuki</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ryoichi</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Toshiyuki</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Elastic plastic and finite displacement analysis of cable stayed bridge</article-title>. <source>Mem Fac Eng</source>. <year>1985</year>;<volume>26</volume>:<fpage>251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-28"><label>[28]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>HG</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Analysis of structural parameters of cable-stayed suspension bridges</article-title>. <source>Adv Mater Res</source>. <year>2010</year>;<volume>163&#x2013;167</volume>:<fpage>2068</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.163-167.2068</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-29"><label>[29]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Analytical optimization and performance evaluation of tuned inerter-negative-stiffness dampers (TINSD) for seismic response control in long-span bridges with floating systems (LBFSs)</article-title>. <source>Earthq Engng Struct Dyn</source>. <year>2025</year>;<volume>54</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>2784</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>804</lpage>. doi:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/eqe.70001</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-30"><label>[30]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Response spectrum and computational analysis of vertical earthquake acceleration for frame structures</article-title>. <source>China New Technol Prod</source>. <year>2013</year>;(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>186</fpage>. <comment>(In Chinese)</comment>.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back></article>